|
J. Marvin Herndon's Nuclear Georeactor |
|
Beginning
in 1969, astronomers discovered that three of the giant planets, Jupiter,
Saturn, and Neptune, each radiate about twice as much energy as they receive
from the Sun. Those planets each contain a powerful energy source which was
inexplicable until J. Marvin Herndon, pictured at left, demonstrated in 1992 the
feasibility of natural, nuclear fission reactors as the energy source for those
planets [1].
Aware that the uranium resides almost exclusively in the alloy portion of the Abee enstatite chondrite, the part corresponding to the Earth's core, in 1993 Herndon published a scientific article, entitled "Feasibility of a nuclear fission reactor at the center of the Earth as the energy source for the geomagnetic field" in the Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity [2]. He followed that a year later with an article in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London [3]. Both articles, like his 1996 article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA [4] were based upon calculations Herndon made using Fermi's nuclear reactor theory. These began a series of step-by-step developments which have carried forward to the present [5-11] and have resulted in a fundamentally new understanding of georeactor structure, georeactor dynamics and georeactor generation of Earth's magnetic field. For more than thirty years, scientists and engineers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have worked to develop, improve, and validate software for numerically simulating the operation of different types of nuclear reactors. Minor modifications were made to the software allowing numerical simulation of Earth's georeactor, which J. M. Herndon published with D. F. Hollenbach in 2001 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA [6]. The numerical simulation calculations, published in 2001, demonstrated that that Earth's georeactor is capable of functioning over the entire period which the Earth has existed, 4.5 billion years, and is capable of producing power at the same levels estimated to be necessary for powering the geomagnetic field. The calculations also showed that the georeactor would operate as a fast neutron breeder reactor and that it must have some inherent mechanism for regulating operating power and for removing fission products. Moreover, the helium fission products from the georeactor turned out to occur in the same range of compositions as the deep-Earth helium found in oceanic basalt [6]. |
|
Evidence for Georeactor Existence |
|
Lacking knowledge of an adequate deep-Earth production mechanism, scientists, for more than thirty years, have assumed that the observed helium-3 is a relic left over from planetary formation 4.5 billion years ago. To explain the helium found in volcanic basalt, scientists have also had to assume that about 9 times as much helium-4 from radioactive decay had to have been mixed with the assumed primordial helium-3 in such a way as to give a rather narrow range of compositions, shown statistically for 95% confidence in table at right. But then along came the georeactor numerical simulations. The figure at left shows more precise helium fission product data for two numerical simulations, published in 2003 by J. Marvin Herndon in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA [7]. for comparison, two bands are shown representing the ranges of helium ratios for mid-oceanic ridges and abandoned oceanic ridges. The arrow shown points to the present age of the Earth. TW stands for million-megawatts, the unit of georeactor power. Note the upward trend in the helium isotope ratios with the passage of time. The increase in the He-3/He-4 ratio is a consequence of the decrease in helium-4 from radioactive decay as the uranium fuel is consumed by nuclear fission. High He-3/He-4 ratios, some as high as 37 relative to air, are observed in Hawaiian and Icelandic basalts. These high ratios are an indication that the end of the georeactor's life is approaching, which means as well the end of the geomagnetic field, but the time frame is unknown [7]. Ultimately, other evidence for georeactor existence may arise, such as seismic evidence and antineutrino evidence. At present, resolution of earthquake waves is not sufficient to reveal the georeactor. Detecting antineutrinos from georeactor fission products holds potential, but technological advances are necessary as well as advances in truthful scientific reporting. For more information, (click here for pdf). |
|
Georeactor Origin of the Earth's Magnetic Field |
|
In 1939 Walter Elsasser proposed that the Earth's magnetic field is produced by a convection-driven dynamo mechanism in Earth's fluid core. Elsasser envisioned convection motions in the fluid core being twisted by planetary rotation into a dynamo, essentially a magnetic amplifier. In 1993, when J. Marvin Herndon demonstrated the feasibility of a nuclear fission reactor at Earth's center, he envisioned the georeactor as being the dynamo's energy source. |
|
There are two reasons why convection is physically impossible in the Earth's fluid core. but not in the georeactor sub-shell. First, for long-term stable convection, the top of the fluid has to be cooler than the bottom. Thus, heat brought to the top must be efficiently removed. The Earth's core is covered with a thick, thermally-insulating blanket, the silicate mantle, which prevents efficient heat loss [8, 9]. Second, convection is physically impossible in the Earth's fluid core [11]. J. Marvin Herndon discovered that, because of compression by the weight of the earth above, the matter at the base of the fluid core is too dense to float to the top as a result of thermal expansion. Convection under those circumstances is physically impossible. Herndon also discovered that the Rayleigh Number, often used to justify convection, is inappropriate for the core, as the Rayleigh Number was derived for an incompressible fluid, a fluid of constant density, of which the core is not. The base of the core is about 23% denser than the top. The impediments to convection in the Earth's fluid core, as noted by Herndon [11], do not exist within the georeactor sub-shell.
|
|
Even though variations in nuclear fuel occur over time, Herndon's georeactor uniquely is expected to be self-regulating through establishing a balance between heat-production and actinide settling-out [11]. In the micro-gravity environment at the center of Earth, georeactor hear production that is too energetic would be expected to cause actinide sub-core disassembly, mixing actinide elements with neutron-absorbers of the sub-shell, quenching the nuclear fission chain reaction. But as the denser actinide elements begin to settle-out of the mix, the chain reaction would re-start, ultimately establishing a balance, an equilibrium between heat-production and actinide settling-out, a self-regulating mechanism.
|
|
Origin of Planetary Magnetic Fields |
|
Magnetized surface areas of Mars and the Moon indicate the former existence of internally generated magnetic fields in those bodies. J. Marvin Herndon has presented evidence attesting to the commonality of matter in the Solar System, which is like that of the deep-interior of Earth, and has made the suggestion [9, 10] that planetary magnetic fields generally arise from the same georeactor-type mechanism which Herndon [8, 9] has suggested generates and powers the Earth’s magnetic field.
|
| YouTube Video: Origin of Earth's Magnetic Field (click here) This video is best "watched in high quality" as it contains an experimental demonstration of why long-term convection, and hence dynamo-action, in the fluid core is impossible. |
|
References |
|
| 1. |
Herndon, J. M., Nuclear fission reactors as energy sources for the giant outer planets. Naturwissenschaften, 1992, 79, 7-14. |
| 2. | Herndon, J. M., Feasibility of a nuclear fission reactor at the center of the Earth as the energy source for the geomagnetic field. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 1993, 45, 423-437. (click here for pdf) |
| 3. | Herndon, J. M., Planetary and protostellar nuclear fission: Implications for planetary change, stellar ignition and dark matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1994, A455, 453-461. (click here for pdf) |
| 4. | Herndon, J. M., Sub-structure of the inner core of the Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 1996, 93, 646-648. (click here for pdf) |
| 5. | Herndon, J. M., Examining the overlooked implications of natural nuclear reactors. Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 79, 451, 456. (click here for pdf) |
| 6. | Hollenbach, D. F. and Herndon, J. M., Deep-Earth reactor: Nuclear fission, helium, and the geomagnetic field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2001, 98, 11085-11090. (click here for pdf) |
| 7. |
Herndon, J. M., Nuclear georeactor origin of oceanic basalt 3He/4He, evidence, and implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2003, 100, 3047-3050. (click here for pdf) |
| 8. | Herndon, J. M., Nuclear georeactor generation of the Earth's geomagnetic field. Current Science, 2007, 93, 1485-1487. (click here for pdf) |
| 9. | Herndon, J. M., Maverick's Earth and Universe. 2008, Vancouver: Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4251-4132-5. |
| 10. | Herndon, J. M., Nature of planetary matter and magnetic field generation in the Solar System. Current Science, 2009, 96, 1033-1039. (click here for pdf) |
| 11. | Herndon, J. M., Uniqueness of Herndon's georeactor: Energy source and production mechanism for Earth's magnetic field. arXiv:0901.4509 28 Jan 2009. (click here for pdf) |