Weather Geoengineering,
Chemtrails, Aluminum and Alzheimer’s:
The Four Horsemen of the Weather
Apocalypse |
J.
Marvin Herndon
(born 1944) is an
American
interdisciplinary scientist, who earned his BA degree in
physics
in 1970 from the
University of California, San Diego
and his Ph.D. degree in
nuclear chemistry
in 1974 from
Texas A&M University.
For three years, J. Marvin
Herndon was a
post-doctoral
assistant to
Hans Suess
and
Harold C. Urey
in
geochemistry
and
cosmochemistry
at the
University of California, San Diego. He is the
President of Transdyne Corporation in San Diego, California.
A listing of more than a dozen of his peer-reviewed
papers can be found on Dr. Herndon’s
Wikipedia page
(click here).
January 20, 2015, Dr. Herndon published his
concerns about weather geoengineering on WeatherGeoengineering.org’s website.
[1]
1) It provides
scientific identification, evidence that can be taken into courts of law; 2) it
shows the horrific public health consequences of coal fly ash aerosol
dispersion; 3) it shows the scientific community that ignored the whole matter
to be institutionally corrupt; 4) it debilitates those who would say there’s
nothing to the particulate trails because, if there were, the scientists would
have investigated it and not a single scientific paper on the subject has been
published (before mine, that is).
In the Spring of 2014, I began to see particulate trails
across the sky that were increasing in frequency and in intensity. By November
2014 the spraying was taking place on a near daily basis sometimes obscuring the
otherwise blue sky with dark artificial clouds. I got involved to use my
training as a scientist to discover what material was being placed in the air
that I, my family, and the citizens of San Diego are being forced to breathe. I
did that, and the first scientific paper on the subject was just published.
Subsequently, I have collected my own rainwater samples, had them analyzed and
discovered some really important measurements that someone made in 2011. In
addition to aluminum, there are a whole host of toxic chemicals that come out of
coal fly ash. I’ve written this as a new paper and submitted it for publication.
Basically, the new paper confirms, with great certainty, the results of the
just-published paper and addresses major public health issues related to the
ongoing spraying of coal fly ash into the troposphere. I first submitted that
paper to a journal called
Environmental Health Perspectives,
which is published by one of the US National Institutes of Health. The paper was
rejected immediately without review and, despite my appeals, was rejected with
finality. What does this say? It says that the US National Institutes of Health,
whose mandate is to protect and improve public health, acts contrary to that
mandate and hides the identity of the toxic material as coal fly ash, and hides
the associated health risks from members of the scientific community and from
ordinary citizens. US National Institutes of Health is, in my view, complicit in
an activity that I allege constitutes crimes against humanity.
CJF:
Climate change apparently began with the UN’s 1988 report.
Why do you think the UN went out on a limb like
that?
There are three
reasons: money, power and control. Many in the UN thought that countries that
produce large amounts of carbon dioxide could be forced to pay poorer countries
through some mechanism such as carbon credits. Initially, this was all about
transferring money from richer nations to poorer nations. I suspect that the UN
would like to run all of the geoengineering activities. What a frightening
thought! What the IPCC does is to evaluate various people’s climate models.
Models are not science. Models are computer programs subject to the well-known
dictum “garbage in, garbage out.” So, you have a committee deciding on which
models are more likely to be correct and assigning a probability. That’s
nonsense. The real problem is that the scientific community, the so-called
establishment, has sold-out. They no longer act as scientists. In all of the
years that people have observed particulate trails, how many university
scientists have investigated those? None! Or at least no one has published a
scientific article on the subject until I did recently. That is shameful
behavior for the scientific community, but it’s all about money, power and
control. I suspect there are sympathetic scientists out there, but they are too
afraid to stand up and act like scientists on the matter. If they did, they
would be “excommunicated,” lose their grants, lose opportunities for promotion
and, perhaps, lose their jobs. Practically everyone involved in geoengineering,
and climate control and related activities, does so for the same three reasons:
money, power and control.
CJF:
In 2008, you wrote the
paper “Variables unaccounted for in global warming and climate change models,”
which was published in the Sept. 2008 issue of
Current Science,
wherein you
claim political, financial, and self-aggrandizement
interests were the “spawning” mechanism for the idea of anthropogenic global
warming/climate change, which took hold, especially with media mainstreaming.
Why do you think that concept or paradigm had to be
invented?
Do you think any political “payback” came into play, since
Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore lost to Republican George W Bush?
Or, are both on the same geoengineering wavelength?
I would say that both parties are on the
climate change/geoengineering gravy train.
CJF:
In that paper you claim there is another explanation other
than human activity.
Will you please tell us what you think it is, and
how you came to that conclusion?
This is actually a long story that the reader might like
to investigate on my website NuclearPlanet.com. The story begins in 1979 when I
realized that the inner core of the Earth might have a different composition
than had been thought for 40 years. My paper on the subject was published in the
Proceedings
of the Royal Society London in 1979. While I
was awaiting publication, I thought that there would be debate and discussion
(as there should be), and that people who had well-funded laboratories would
take the idea and run with it, leaving me in the dust. That did not happen.
Instead, it was as if the paper had never been published. It was completely
ignored, my renewal grants encountered problems, I was “excommunicated” and out
of the academic business. But, I was onto something important and kept pursuing
the matter on my own and making one discovery after another. Eventually, I came
to understand that when the Earth formed initially, it formed as a gas giant
planet, like Jupiter, with the rocky part crushed by about 300 Earth-masses of
gas and ice. When the sun ignited, the super intense solar wind stripped the
gases from our planet leaving a compressed rocky planet without ocean basins.
Over time, pressures built and the earth began to decompress. This potentially
variable decompression is responsible for the surface geology, for emplacing
heat at the base of the crust, and is the driving force for earthquakes. There
is geological evidence to support variable heat output from the Earth. There is
also evidence that the Sun’s output is not constant. Yet these two powerful
energy sources are assumed constant in climate models.
CJF:
If, as you state in
your June 2015 paper, “Aluminum poisoning of humanity and Earth’s biota by
clandestine geoengineering activity: implications for India,” [Current
Science,
Vol. 108, No. 12, 25 June 2015, 2173-2176] the idea for geoengineering
apparently came from observations of major volcanic eruptions and that their ash
remains in the upper atmosphere (stratosphere) for close to a year, what do you
think, then, was the real incentive for weather geoengineering and why?
Initially, weather
geoengineering was meant to benefit agriculture, but later it became weaponized
for military purposes. Then along came global warming with all the political and
financial benefits.
CJF:
If weather geoengineering has been going on for a while, why do you think it’s
been ratcheted up dramatically since 2013?
Coincidentally, USA weather patterns since 2013
have been dramatic, especially East coast winters!
Any comment about that?
“Why” is the big
question! Unlike the geoengineering academics talk about, i.e., spraying
particles into the upper atmosphere (stratosphere), the ongoing covert
geoengineering sprays coal fly ash into the troposphere, the lower atmosphere,
which mixes with the air people breathe. The particles do not remain suspended
in the lower atmosphere for long periods of time as they do in the upper
atmosphere, so spraying has to be done on a daily basis. If the spraying of coal
fly ash into the troposphere is being done to counteract global warming, it is a
questionable practice. The artificial clouds may block sunlight during the day,
but at night those same clouds keep heat from leaving the Earth. Moreover,
dispersed particulates pose the impediment to rainfall which operates counter to
cooling the Earth. Coal fly ash does that plus something even worse: it absorbs
water, so it changes the natural rainfall patterns. So one must wonder, is the
intention to combat global warming or to cause global warming so as to melt the
Arctic ice to get at the oil beneath. In either case, the consequence on humans
and Earth’s biota [ecology] is horrific.
CJF:
Weather geoengineering can be seen in the skies in the
form of airplane exhausts that widen to form what I call “blanket clouds,” which
can cause a cloud cover over a perfectly cloudless blue sky within an hour or
so.
We know that they are not jet engine exhausts, since it’s
almost impossible for modern jet engines to create what are called contrails.
Some real contrails can occur when atmospheric
conditions are correct at higher altitudes.
They dissipate within a minute or so, and do not
spread out to create an artificial cloud cover.
However, the sky trails, referred to colloquially
as “chemtrails,” are created at lower atmospheric levels by deliberately
spraying “stuff” into the air.
Can you please tell us what that “stuff” is?
The “stuff,” as I
discovered scientifically, is coal combustion fly ash. When utilities burn coal
to produce electricity, two kinds of ash are formed: heavy ash that settles out
and fly ash that would go up the smoke-stack unless it is trapped with
electrostatic precipitators, as now required by Western governments because coal
fly ash contains impurities that were in the coal, but in concentrated form in
the fly ash. These toxic impurities are readily leached, that is, extracted into
water. That is one reason why this substance is such an environmental hazard.
CJF:
Can you explain why coal fly ash is used as the principal
ingredient?
If it’s an industrial byproduct from the coal
burning power producing plants globally, is weather geoengineering a disposal
means for a hazardous waste, similar to fluoridation of water supplies for
aluminum wastes and the fertilizer industry?
1) the particle size is ideal; 2) it’s an industrial waste
product that’s available worldwide on a huge scale; 3) it’s cheap because
utilities would have to pay the costs of securing the product from the
environment; 4) the utilities already have in place the production facilities
and transportation network, out of public view. But using coal fly ash has
serious, deleterious consequences for human health, Earth’s biota [ecology], and
natural weather processes. Moreover, its utility is limited unless its purpose
is to cause drought. [I
find it rather interesting that you should say that!]
CJF:
In your paper you state that coal fly ash from different
European power plants was analyzed and also exposed to water for 24 hours, and
then the water was analyzed. Some pretty dangerous elements were found in the
water that had been extracted from the coal fly ash, e.g., radioactive uranium
and thorium, aluminum, barium and strontium!
Coincidentally, those very elements have been
identified in rain water samples collected.
Please expound upon what that means for human
health, the Earth’s biota, and possible species extinction(s).
In a word: Horrific.
My just-submitted paper deals with the subject, so, to prevent compromising its
publication, let’s wait until after it is published.
CJF:
Absolutely! However, I’d really love to interview you
about it as soon as possible after publication.
I guess my next question apparently is moot at this
point: What are the negative aspects and effects of coal fly ash and the
elements found in it? I
guess I’ll just have to wait for the answer in the published paper.
In the just-published
paper, I discussed the health risks of aluminum in a chemically mobile state as
relates to neurological disorders. The most vulnerable are the children
[fetuses] pregnant women are carrying, children, the elderly, and those with
compromised immune and respiratory systems. There is much more information in my
just-submitted paper.
CJF:
Do you think chemtrail particulates contribute to the
dramatic rise in asthma and lung disease, plus Alzheimer’s and other dementias?
Are there any other health problems that can be
attributed to or associated with “chemtrails” or coal fly ash?
Yes, and if correct,
there will be a big spike in their occurrence in the USA after January 20, 2013.
CJF:
Can you explain what’s being found in rain water assays in
Europe?
Have similar rain water assays been done in the
USA, especially in California?
Do you know of any areas assayed in the USA?
Most of the
post-spraying rainwater analyses are done for aluminum and barium; occasionally
strontium analyses are requested. The problem is that, comparatively speaking,
there have been relatively few chemical analyses worldwide. The reason is
because there is no well-funded research program on the subject, so individuals
typically collect the samples and pay for the analyses from commercial labs out
of their own pockets. Generally speaking, rainwater analyses for the above three
elements are similar throughout the world where such measurements have been
made. Regrettably, as can be seen from my recently published paper, there are
comparatively few data points.
CJF:
Apparently then, rain water assays performed in both the
USA and Europe produced similar results, as those done elsewhere in the world.
I find that not only interesting, but rather
incriminating. As an aside, what do you think the “geopolitical” reason is for
creating a deliberate drought in California, which is the premiere fresh food
producing state in the USA?
That’s a good
question, but an unanswerable question. It’s hard to believe that those who
ordered the spraying are unaware of the drought potential. It would make a lot
more sense, if it were the case that ISIS ordered the spraying. Do our officials
hate America enough to destroy the potential for food production in its most
important agricultural state? The problem with covert operations is not knowing
the intent. There may be several agendas in play here.
CJF: I’d venture to
say that there may be vested interests at work to create “water wars” that would
lead to water use taxes, similar to the much-ballyhooed “carbon taxes.”
I do not know what
might have contributed to such a huge difference. As the three elements
“fingerprint” were not measured, nothing can be said as to what the source of
aluminum was in that instance.
CJF:
Can you please talk about why the federal or states
governments aren’t doing anything about analyzing rainwater and publishing
results?
Can the answer be similar as to why radiation
measuring devices in California were turned off after Fukushima?
The quick answer is
that they are all “in the tank.” The EPA was supposed to certify coal fly ash as
a hazardous material, but surprisingly did not. Moreover, the allowable limit
for aluminum in drinking water was raised significantly. And, as I described
above, the US National Institutes of Health rejected the opportunity to advise
the scientific community and others of the identity and public health risks of
aerosolized coal fly ash.
CJF: Do you think
coal fly ash has been sprayed for close to 15 years in the USA, and what does
that mean for agricultural and drinking water quality; agricultural soils and
food crops uptake of aluminum, which should not be an element in food crops; and
ambient outdoor air quality?
I have one analysis
of rainwater from 2002 showing the three element fingerprint of coal fly ash.
Chemically mobile aluminum has deleterious effects on plant growth. Aluminum
corrupts the soil and damages plants. But of all of the consequences, I suspect
the worst is on humans, who have breathed coal fly ash for years.
CJF:
As an aside, I’m a retired natural nutritionist and I
never remember learning, or reading, about aluminum as a “nutrient” in food
crops.
Caution about aluminum cookware has been known for
years, since acid/alkaline balance transfers come into play during cooking with
aluminum cookware.
You state that weather geoengineering is
“clandestine.”
How can that be, when its effects are in plain
sight above our heads daily?
Who is doing the spraying?
I understand there are airlines devoted to doing
just that on a global basis, plus U.S. military planes, and those planes do not
file flight plans and at times have almost caused accidents with commercial
airliners.
Even when visible
overhead, the operation is clandestine or covert when specific information is
withheld, especially the chemical composition, the purpose, the public health
consequences, etc. and there exists in its place, an organized pattern of
disinformation.
CJF:
One of the
most disturbing facts you point out in your article is that weather
geoengineering—especially the aluminum associated with it—is associated with
neurological diseases including autism, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ADHD, and
others.
Additionally, that
humans have not evolved
with a natural immunity to aluminum.
Of
course we haven’t, because most of the aluminum was found embedded in the
earth’s crust and not available to humans in “free form” in the air we breathe,
the water we drink or the food we eat.
As you state above,
aluminum is securely locked up in silicate compounds. Thus, neither the plants
nor creatures of Earth developed any defense mechanism for chemically mobile
aluminum. The Gomati River is a tributary to the Ganga River, or Ganges as we
call it. The Ganga River is extremely important to the people in India. With all
of the sources of its pollution, the ritual bathing that takes place is in
relative safety. Apparently, there are organisms that cleanse the river. If
mobile aluminum were to destroy those organisms, it would cause a massive
problem.
I proposed that
Indians conduct experiments to determine whether other countries’ coal fly ash
geoengineering is causing the high levels of mobile aluminum, or is it a
consequence of India’s coal burning power plants that do not sequester coal fly
ash.
CJF:
India has an Alzheimer’s disease problem, as do many
countries of the world.
According to this
My interest in
aluminum-implicated neurological disorders caused by coal fly ash is the same
throughout the world. I suspect that the aerosolized coal fly ash may be a
leading cause.
CJF: “Worldwide, Alzheimer’s is found in at least one
among 10 persons who are more than 80-year-old and one out of four persons who
are above 90 years.
In India, there are nearly 50 lakh [in 100,000]
dementia patients of which, roughly 70 to 80 percent have Alzheimer’s.
The Indian numbers are expected to double by 2030,
and the costs involved are expected to increase three times.”
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/many-unaware-of-alzheimers-disease-in-india/article5390719.ece
http://www.alz.org/in/dementia-alzheimers-en.asp
Here
http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/alzheimers-dementia/by-country/
is a map representing the death rates per 100,000 globally
from Alzheimer’s/Dementia.
Isn’t weather
geoengineering a blatant disregard and breach of the Nuremberg Code, especially
since there is no citizen informed consent about what apparently is a global
“scientific experiment” going on for years for some ultimate purpose?
Would you like to guestimate as to what that
purpose may be?
As I understand it,
there are UN prohibitions against using weather modification against other
countries, but it is permissible within one’s own country. In reality, weather
is a global phenomenon.
CJF:
Realistically, couldn’t weather
modification be considered an act of aggression against another
country—interfering with a country’s ability to raise food or experience severe
floods or drought?
In the USA, Alzheimer’s is the sixth leading cause of death!
In 2015, Alzheimer’s and
other dementias will cost the nation $226 BILLION.
By 2050, those costs
could rise as high as $1.1TRILLION.
In the USA, every 67
seconds someone develops Alzheimer’s.
[2]
I note that you state in your paper that “After the US
President Barack Hussein Obama was sworn in for a second term in office on 20
January, 2014, geoengineering activities escalated sharply, becoming a
near-daily occurrence in many parts of America.”
That it happened, I
observed firsthand, as did many people who look at the sky with concern. Why?
Perhaps an unholy alliance between scientists without moral values, who are
arrogant enough to think they can control nature, but who are ignorant of why
they cannot, and those with vested interests, who have the same absence of moral
(humanitarian) values.
CJF:
However, in a January 2014 Press Release didn’t President
Obama say,
“Hundreds of countries are carrying out weather
modification programs, and we’re doing it better than any of them. However, this
has been secret for too long. The American People need to know about what we do
to make sure our children have something to eat each and every year. It’s true
we need more oversight for geoengineering projects, so I’ve signed an executive
order establishing an international third party oversight group to not only
investigate for abuse but also to keep the public informed about new and
existing geoengineering programs.”
And,
“Geoengineering
is necessary for our country’s agricultural industries and keeps millions of
Americans employed every year. Our efforts in high altitude microwave technology
at HAARP combined with the innovations in cloud seeding technology introduced by
the jet fuel industry gives the American People a level of control over the
elements unprecedented in the history of mankind. American Scientists are
quickly approaching capabilities which will not only curb global climate change,
but also to put an end to disastrous hurricanes and typhoons. For decades these
programs have been kept secret out of concern for national security, but I have
decided there is no need to keep this program a secret. Sensational reports that
the United States will exist in a ‘bubble’ as the rest of the world heats up
uncontrollably have no basis in scientific fact.”
[3]
Geoscientists seem to
have little understanding of that which is not known, especially, the multitude
of diverse and complex interactions that keep nature in a state of equilibrium.
More realistically than the above optimistic-nonsense, due to geoscience
tinkering with nature, our planet and its life-forms will suffer severe
consequences unleased by the foolish and inhumane.
CJF:
Here is a NOAA National Climatic Data Center map showing
land and ocean temperature percentiles from January to December 2013.
Personally, I wonder how factually realistic it is,
especially what’s shown for the eastern Pacific Ocean, where the legend
indicates a “new average.”
Furthermore, I’d
like to point out that scientifically-speaking, what’s seen in the skies sprayed
above us is referred to as “weather geoengineering” or weather modification or
even atmospheric engineering, and not chemtrails, the colloquial term most
readers are familiar with.
However, chemtrails also are known as the Jet Fuel
Cloud Seeding Program (JFCSP) working in conjunction with the
classified High
Altitude Auroral Research Project (HAARP) which, apparently, are being managed
by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and DARPA.
Thank you, Dr.
Herndon, for sharing your scientific expertise.
We look forward to another interview with you in
the near future about the effects of aluminum on humans and all life forms.
References:
[1]
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/well-known-scientist-sounds-the-alarm-on-geoengineering/
[2]
http://www.alz.org/facts/overview.asp